Log in

No account? Create an account
10 September 2007 @ 05:12 pm
Pondering Eschatological Cosmology  

In an article that opens by retelling the story of Alvie Singer’s childhood existential crisis (from Annie Hall), Jim Holt interviews a number of prominent cosmologists and eventually works his way around to this thought:

  • Why should we want the universe to last forever, anyway? Look—either the universe has a purpose or it doesn’t. If it doesn’t, then it is absurd. If it does have a purpose, then there are two possibilities: Either this purpose is eventually achieved, or it is never achieved. If it is never achieved, then the universe is futile. But if it is eventually achieved, then any further existence of the universe is pointless. So, no matter how you slice it, an eternal universe is either (a) absurd, (b) futile, or (c) eventually pointless.
    —Jim Holt, “How Will the Universe End?” in The Best American Science Writing 2005, Alan Lightman (editor), Jesse Cohen (series editor), Harper Perennial, New York, 2005, p.56.


Current Mood: thoughtfulthoughtful
kip_wkip_w on September 11th, 2007 02:18 pm (UTC)
"Has a purpose"? I'm not sure what this means. Is it like having a big red clown nose? Either it has one of those, or it doesn't. If it does, it's silly and deserves to end. If it doesn't, it has no sense of humor and deserves to end.
Fred A Levy Haskell: Fredcritter eyes onlyfredcritter on September 13th, 2007 11:36 pm (UTC)
Squeeze the wheeze!
Many people like to…